Information & Ethics committee  I can send it.

Information & Ethics committee  I will give some context. It is not on the motion. It is on the challenge of the speaking order of the chair. Ms. Damoff challenged the speaking order and the question is shall the decision of the chair be sustained.

Information & Ethics committee  Yes. This is for the other study. It's the RCMP study, regarding SNC-Lavalin. I was informed that the RCMP commissioner would not be available after December 11. He is available to appear and confirmed, unless the committee wants to modify the plan. He is confirmed to appear wit

Information & Ethics committee  Certainly. According to the plan distributed on November 7, witnesses were supposed to be invited to today's meeting. They were indeed invited. The Citizen Lab representative is in Taiwan and the time does not work for him unless the committee meets at a different time. The othe

Information & Ethics committee  It was distributed to all members.

Information & Ethics committee  Thank you. To answer Ms. Khalid, invitations were sent over the last week to CSIS, the Centre for Cyber Security and to the rapid response mechanism from GAC. Only one of them emailed me and tried to call me during the meeting, so I don't know what the answer is. The two others

Information & Ethics committee  We had Mr. Barrett's motion, then we debated it. Next, Ms. Damoff moved something, and that was followed by another debate. Then we discussed an amendment with Mr. Villemure and adopted it. So we resumed debate on the motion as amended, and now Mr. Villemure is going to move an

Information & Ethics committee  I'd like to make something clear before things get too complicated. Mr. Villemure, you mentioned a subamendment, but that would mean an amendment to Ms. Damoff's amendment. However, we're not there anymore. It's important to use the right term so as not to get mixed up in the v

Information & Ethics committee  Mr. Villemure is moving that we amend the whole part of Ms. Damoff's amendment that starts with “review the appropriateness of any redactions”.

Information & Ethics committee  Okay. Mr. Villemure is moving that the part of Ms. Damoff's amendment that begins with “review the appropriateness of any redactions; and where redactions are deemed necessary, an explanation be provided for each redaction, within 24 hours” be replaced with “review the need for

Information & Ethics committee  Here are the text with the changes and the amendment proposed by Mr. Villemure, which I received in French: That the Committee, considering that the government's unsatisfactory response to the order adopted on October 18, 2023, and its failure to respond to the order adopted on

Information & Ethics committee  We have a motion in English only, so the interpreters have the text and will provide interpretation.

Information & Ethics committee  I am not translating the motion. I am not a translator, I'm a clerk. I put in a request with the translation service, and was told it had been accepted. However, I can't say how long it will take to translate the motion, as that is not my responsibility.

Information & Ethics committee  The motion was amended for two meetings.

Information & Ethics committee  The clerk will not, on their own, decide on a deadline. The motion, and the amendment by Ms. Fortier when the motion was debated, was to ask for a copy, but there was no specific date. The clerk can only pass the motion over and say, “This was adopted, so we want a copy.” I canno