Justice committee  We've had four federal-provincial-territorial meetings of what we call our CCSO, our committee of senior officers. They are the criminal law specialists across the country in every province and territory. We have started by looking at what the data tells us where the problem is

Public Safety committee  That is correct. They've had no involvement in the decision to disclose the 2,400 pages or to flag the 35 pages for review. In fact, they've had no involvement in any of the productions of the 75,000 documents that have been produced so far.

Public Safety committee  That is correct.

Public Safety committee  I don't think so. I'll just quickly go through it, but I think we've covered everything that's in the letter. No. I have nothing else. Thank you.

Public Safety committee  We had already produced documents relevant to that at the commission, yes. I don't understand why Chief Superintendent Leather would say that we advised him he couldn't talk about that, when those documents were already public. In fact, we were all talking about that. That was pa

Public Safety committee  That's correct. I heard him mention it, I think at this committee, on the 25th. Our counsel, who are working in Halifax on the team, were in hearing that day and didn't hear it, but they heard it from him when he testified at the commission on the 27th, in 2022.

Public Safety committee  He did not raise it on July 5, when our counsel met with him. He raised it for the very first time when he testified before this committee.

Public Safety committee  We meet with every witness to help them prepare for their testimony. It's part of the service we provide as the Department of Justice. We prepare the RCMP and other departments for their testimony before the commission.

Public Safety committee  I've spoken with the two counsel who met with him on the 5th. They tell me that he did not raise it. It is not in the notes he submitted as part of the 2,400 pages of notes. Nothing in his notes mentions this call to the commissioner on the 22nd. During his testimony, our counse

Public Safety committee  I'm saying that our counsel are telling me that he did not bring it up at the meeting and he didn't reach out for us to talk about the April 22 call. He met with counsel in order to be prepared on his entire testimony, not just the question of the April 28 meeting or the call of

Public Safety committee  I have not reviewed it myself, no, but our counsel have, and the redacted version—

Public Safety committee  We have produced a copy of the report for the commission. The commission has not yet decided whether to make it public, in part or in whole—

Public Safety committee  It is redacted for personal information. That is my understanding, but I haven't seen it myself.

Public Safety committee  Our team members and the commission's counsel have regular discussions during the process. The commission could decide to complete its mandate at the end of August and request that documents one to 2,000, for instance, be forwarded to it. If that were the case, we would work to p

Public Safety committee  If we had documents under review that may be relevant to the investigation, we would advise the commission. If the commission told us that it intended to conclude the investigation in three weeks, we would tell it that we had documents to produce.