Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Status of Women committee Certainly. Thank you. This motion is in relation to subsection 62.1(1) of the Judges Act, which encourages the CJC to report on certain seminars. Currently the bill would expand that report to include seminars on intimate partner violence and coercive control. My understanding
May 13th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee Certainly. Thank you, Shannon. As the member noted, this new clause that's being proposed to the bill would expand the undertaking that's currently found in section 3 of the Judges Act. At the moment, the undertaking in the Judges Act relates to seminars on sexual assault law an
May 13th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee Thank you for that question. I'm not able to provide information on what is included in current training for judges and what might be included in future training in terms of content. Judicial independence requires that judges control judicial education, including the content of
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee The Judges Act as amended by former Bill C-3 lists training on matters related to sexual assault law and social context as topics on which the CJC may establish seminars.
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee The only topics that are currently listed are sexual assault law and social context; however, the CJC is able to establish seminars on other topics.
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee At the moment, that provision encourages the CJC to provide a report to the Minister of Justice on seminars on sexual assault law training and on social context that have been offered in the previous year.
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee That's correct. The CJC would be encouraged to report on those seminars as well.
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee As my colleague mentioned, as department officials we're not able to offer opinions on potential amendments or suggest amendments to a bill. However, I will address your question in a different way. As you noted, the judiciary does have control over judicial education, including
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee Thank you for that note on judicial education. The principle of judicial independence requires that the judiciary control judicial education on a range of topics, and that would include training on coercive control and intimate partner violence. It will be up to the judiciary.
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee As you noted, judicial independence requires judicial training over education for judges. This includes both the content of judicial training and whether judges are required to attend training or which training judges take. That decision would be up to the judiciary as well.
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee Certainly. I think the two organizations that you're mentioning are the Canadian Judicial Council, the CJC, and then there's the National Judicial Institute, the NJI. The CJC is an organization that's made up of all of the chief justices across Canada. They're responsible for s
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee Yes, thank you. I'll take that question. Thank you for the question about what judges are learning or how the definition of coercive control is used in judicial education. The constitutional principle of judicial independence requires that the judiciary control judicial educatio
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee As I mentioned, the NJI, which is the primary provider of judicial education, would be better placed to answer the question on what they offer currently to judges.
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor
Status of Women committee Thank you for that question. Again, as I mentioned, the content of judicial education and what it would cover is a responsibility of the judiciary, in this case the Canadian Judicial Council and the National Judicial Institute. They would be better placed to answer questions abo
May 6th, 2022Committee meeting
Melissa Moor