Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Information & Ethics committee Yes, I had a reasonable doubt.
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee That's a matter of national security and measures that national security agencies take to prevent violations of Canadian law. It's an issue in that area.
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee Yes, methods for gathering information and intercepting communications have always existed, but this tool takes intrusive information-gathering to a new level. What the RCMP says may be justifiable, but I don't agree that the use of this tool shouldn't have been subject to a pri
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee Did I answer your question?
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee Once again, that involves the role of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner and the courts. According to one of the criteria set forth in part VI of the Criminal Code, the court must be satisfied that no other means exist to achieve the desired result, which is to gather evidenc
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee I think that speaks to the fact that there are many players, and each should play its role without duplicating the role of others. The courts have an important role, but the courts are bound by the terms of part VI of the Criminal Code. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner look
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee Generally, under the Criminal Code, if there's an invasion of privacy through the use of investigative techniques—wiretaps would be a traditional method—judicial authorization is also required. Search activities, obviously, which do affect privacy, require judicial authorization.
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee No, on the basis that courts provide independent oversight, and it's a mechanism that works on its own.
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee I'm confident that the courts apply the law correctly. If there's an error, there are appellate mechanisms to ensure that the law is applied correctly. I think it goes back to part VI of the Criminal Code that sets the standards for the courts having a certain definition of priva
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee My answer to that would be that the role of the OPC might be to look into how the authorization process worked in individual cases, not with a view to be revisiting what the courts had done—that would be inappropriate—but with a view to determining whether the legislation is suff
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee There are different provisions for CSIS and for the CSE, the Communications Security Establishment, for the interception of communications. Do these institutions use ODIT-like technology? I don't know, it's quite possible, but there are certainly laws governing the use of technol
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee No, I completed my thought.
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee Yes, I was.
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
Information & Ethics committee The OPC plays a number of roles. One of them is to investigate complaints and serve, as I said a few minutes ago, as an independent oversight to the government. The government has to comply with the law. It is assisted by the justice department, whose duty is to ensure that the g
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien
August 9th, 2022Committee meeting
Daniel Therrien