Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Justice committee From what I can say, it appears to me that you tried to follow the road map that the Supreme Court had laid out for you, and of course whether there are ways in which the legislation could be improved.... Now that you have more time to think about it, I expect it is what you're l
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee Yes.
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee I don't think the question is a legal question. It's a scientific question.
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee How would it work before Brown? Well, it was a pretty short analysis. The Crown would analyze the evidence to see whether we could make out mens rea and actus reus to the extent that an accused wanted to argue that because of intoxication, they lacked the mens rea.... I'm sorry
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee Okay. Very good. I was saying, to the extent that the accused wanted to raise intoxication as a way of showing that they lacked one of the elements of the events. Then, if it was what the law calls a specific intent defence, that would be fine. So, if you were charged with murde
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee Right. So, what the Supreme Court said was that the problem with that approach is that you have to have a degree of fault to convict somebody. You can't convict somebody who, for example, went to see a doctor, got a prescription, took their medication, had a completely unforeseen
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee Thank you for the question. I think, in determining where you want to go, you probably need to start with the Supreme Court's decision, which makes it abundantly clear that, absent negligence.... Sorry, let me back up. The court has taken a strong position that, absent fault, w
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee Thank you for the question. As Ms. Jules indicated earlier, you can never guarantee a result in a criminal case. It's important to always remain conscious of the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that rests upon the Crown in every prosecution. That said, there are a numb
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. As you know, the Daviault decision, some 30 years ago, already placed the burden to raise the defence on the accused. I should note that it did so in relation to all general-intent defences, not just violent ones. I think what proposed subsection 33.1(2)
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler
Justice committee Sure. First of all, the legislation refers to both. You will see that it says, in subsection 33.1(2), that in “determining whether the person departed markedly from the standard of care, the court must consider the objective foreseeability of the risk that the consumption of the
October 31st, 2022Committee meeting
Ami Kotler