Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 76-90 of 162
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Veterans Affairs committee  Unless they meet very, very specific criteria here, which almost exclude them.

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  I could almost turn to our president to answer this one, but I might just suggest off the bat that we are very aware that we must transform ourselves. We're trying to do that, but we want to do it without government support.

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  As for your first question, the document states:3.1 General eligibility for health care programs is derived by virtue of being recognized: a) As having been granted a pension from Veterans Affairs Canada; We are talking about a pension here, not a lump sum payment. Some modern s

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  That is right, if the person has not been deemed eligible for a pension.

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  Yes, but today, you are no longer eligible for a pension according to the new Veterans Charter. This is the case only under the Pension Act.

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  We are suggesting that we solve this shortcoming, not by giving access to all modern veterans, but at least to those who have served in a special duty area, such as Afghanistan, or to those who have obtained a medical discharge.

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  The lump-sum payment was probably established in 2004. At that time, we had already begun to prepare the new program, which was finally presented and adopted in 2005. In 2004, when we compared the lump-sum payments to those awarded by civil courts, the department felt that the l

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  I'll answer your two questions. The first one on SISIP is a very good question, because it brings attention to what I would call a fundamental problem with the new veterans charter, which is that it is still an insurance-based program. The new veterans charter has felt bound to

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  I would not give you priorities. There are 15 recommendations in the New Veterans Charter Advisory Group report and all 15 recommendations are important. Some deal with families. Some deal with economic benefits. Some deal with rehabilitation. I think they are all important. They

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  I'll answer your question by going back to the commitment that this is a living charter, that the living charter gaps would be corrected within two years of introduction. That was done because there was no scrutiny of the legislation in committee, as you are well aware. On that

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  I could tell you about the greatest feedback we're getting, and that's not answering your question....

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  Okay. I'm getting closer. The greatest feedback that we are getting is that there are very, very bad feelings about the economic benefits.

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  I think we have to take some measures now. For example, on giving away priority access beds in long-term care facilities because of normal attrition, if we don't look at that and say that in the coming years we will still need a basic minimum of beds in these facilities, those be

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard

Veterans Affairs committee  Our point of view is that all those beds should be reserved.

October 29th, 2009Committee meeting

Pierre Allard