Foreign Affairs committee  Mr. Chair, I would offer that, in terms of coordinating amendments, there were changes made to the inadmissibility regime under Bill S-223 around trafficking in human organs. In bringing these additional changes to the inadmissibility regime, there are coordinating amendments to—

Foreign Affairs committee  That is correct—and that we not undo—

Foreign Affairs committee  Yes, I'm just—

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you. Yes, I think this is a closing of the gap. It is an alignment of regimes. I think it's also fair to say that it doesn't necessarily introduce new discretion. As you say, it is about alignment across all regimes.

Foreign Affairs committee  GAC, again, on the application of sanctions, if you could....

Foreign Affairs committee  Just to reiterate, the two processes are baked in. If an individual finds themselves on the sanctions list, the recourse is through the mechanism for the determination of sanctions. That exists. That is in place. With respect to the inadmissibility decision, as Mr. Bush has exp

Foreign Affairs committee  The recourse is already in place, as we have laid it out, and that is part and parcel of the—

Foreign Affairs committee  So....

Foreign Affairs committee  I'm happy to come back to you on that.

Foreign Affairs committee  I'll invite Mr. Bush to unpack that a bit, to get to the heart of your question.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you for your question. It is not by accident that someone is on that list. I would ask Mr. Bush to elaborate on why these terms were not defined in the bill.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you for the question. I would ask Mr. Bush to provide clarification on the numbers and the exact amounts. I think it is about 2,900 individuals, not 2,700. Perhaps my colleagues from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada can answer your questions about visas.

Foreign Affairs committee  We ensured that all the powers coordinate the amendments so the framework remains the same.

Foreign Affairs committee  I would invite GAC to speak to the sanctions process and then on the application of that to the inadmissibility regime.

Foreign Affairs committee  In response, I would turn first to colleagues at GAC. I think it is about alignment. When you are sanctioned, that means you are then inadmissible to Canada. We have a regime, and the inadmissibility regime was not aligned with that. It is now. The precision, I think, is really a