Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-7 of 7
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  The last time NDP-6 was adopted, there were unforeseen circumstances, in that joint service standards with respect to timelines between the PCRC, the CBSA, the RCMP and now unions were removed from it with respect to complaints. What this new subamendment does is re-establish a

November 6th, 2023Committee meeting

Martin Leuchs

Public Safety committee  I can't speak to the form that the service standards would take, but it would require them, with the unions, to establish those service standards.

November 6th, 2023Committee meeting

Martin Leuchs

Public Safety committee  The timelines that we're trying to introduce are the same provisions that are currently under the RCMP Act between the CRCC and the RCMP. The establishment of the timelines is not between the three organizations but between the PCRC and the RCMP and then the PCRC and the CBSA re

November 6th, 2023Committee meeting

Martin Leuchs

Public Safety committee  And the unions, based on the amendment that was introduced by the NDP. There is also a GIC power-making regulation that could be used with respect to the timelines, in case there is a need to ensure that regulations around those timelines exist.

November 6th, 2023Committee meeting

Martin Leuchs

Public Safety committee  It fixes an issue that had been introduced.

November 6th, 2023Committee meeting

Martin Leuchs

November 6th, 2023Committee meeting

Martin Leuchs

Public Safety committee  The PCRC would be able to access privileged information. My understanding of this amendment is that it is a consequential amendment to NDP-16 that would actually provide the PCRC with access to excluded information under clause 19, which would entail solicitor-client privileged i

October 25th, 2023Committee meeting

Martin Leuchs