Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Status of Women committee It may be helpful to know that it is in there in the context of domestic violence due to the approach taken in Bill C-233. That one explicitly requires consideration of the use of electronic monitoring as a bail condition for a certain narrow set of offences. That would include s
February 1st, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee Yes. Bill C-233 maintains.... It can be used even if it's not explicitly in a peace bond. There is a broader option for this to be used in any context. That's in the peace bond context. In the bond context, Bill C-233 speaks explicitly in terms of violence against a person, whet
February 1st, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee Why would we?
February 1st, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee That decision was already made with subclause 1(2)β
February 1st, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee Thank you for the question. Originally, as was explained by the member, that's what would happen. However, you'll remember that subclause 1(2) of Bill S-205, regarding electronic monitoring, has been removed. Bill S-205 no longer deals with electronic monitoring in the bail cont
February 1st, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee Thank you, Chair. When you delete a paragraph, that affects the other paragraphs after. If you get rid of (f), then (g) becomes (f), and (i) becomes (h), for example. In this situation, (i) becomes (h).
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee It provides consistency across the Criminal Code.
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee Amendment G-12 just renumbers a reference in the bill to form 51. That form is served to someone who is required to provide a sample of a bodily substance. It's just a renumbering: (i) becomes (h). This is due to G-6, which deleted the social media condition. Does that help?
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee If we're looking at line 37, it's just clarifying that it's for that specific.... Is your question whether section 810.03 is right? Is that what the question is?
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee It's 810. It's a correction.
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee In G-10, it should be 810, yes, because section 810.03 outlines the rules for taking a sample of a bodily substance.
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee No. That was a typo.
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee I'm sorry.
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee If people have questions, we can answer, but basically, as was said, it's to make the form match the provision that was adopted at a previous meeting, just so there's consistency from one place to the next.
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol
Status of Women committee Line 15 on page 3 of the bill reads as follows: βto wear an electronic monitoring device, with the consent of the Attorney General.β This provision, which amends section 810.03 of the Criminal Code, differs from the provision amending form 32 of the Criminal Code. That provision
January 30th, 2024Committee meeting
Julia Nicol