Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 53
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  Here's what we are going to do with the appropriations and the estimates for the next five years.

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  It could pick six or seven departments, and for the next five years, the studies would relate from the last set of appropriations to the one being proposed, or to a particular issue flowing from that department—the procurement or whatever. Or another part could be thematic. It co

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  That's right. If a report were tabled in the House and you chose to concur it in, you would take up that debate between one and two on Wednesdays. The minister would be present and would have to answer to that report.

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  Once I was no longer the clerk—I actually never would have dared say so while I held that position—I pointed out that, in my opinion, parliamentarians—the House—had abandoned that role. With time, the interest fizzled out. How much interest do MPs have in sitting down and scrutin

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  I don't think that person has any power. They have no authority. According to the newspapers, the officer is complaining that no one gives him access to documents. If he were an officer of the House associated with this committee, he would have all the power. A motion ordering th

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  I don't want to attribute motives to it. At the time, when Parliament had Bill C-2 before it and I appeared as a witness, I said that it was at the wrong place and that part of the mandate was missing. If you want Parliament or the House of Commons to have elements that contribut

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  The mandate would be binding. The way I would draft the standing order for this five-year study plan, to be tabled in the House in the first 60 days of its appointment, would be a mandatory instruction from the House—“It shall do it”—just like the procedure committee shall review

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  I think the mandate of the PBO should be largely in support of committees on supply. If you're studying whether the age of qualification for the OAS should be reduced or not, you have ample access to experts out there who can come in on contract and work with your witnesses. But

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  When it comes to the estimates themselves, the supply, that's all you can do. What the Speaker ruled was that the committees, at the same time, had the power to report to the House. What they were doing was saying, we approve of these estimates, but we make the following recommen

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  Mr. Chair, I think this a topic for a very long and in-depth dissertation.

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  Yes, I know. Is this a national trend? I read Mr. Wehner's testimony, according to which Canada is something of an example, with its parliamentary budget officer. The idea is that we should keep things as they are. In the Westminster system, accountability lies with the House, a

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  I can comment on both issues. On the deemed reported issue, I think it should stay in the Standing Orders. Not for the reasons I said, but you're still under the gun to adopt, reduce, or negative within that period. After that, they're gone from the committee in terms of the cap

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  I pointed out that the government needs to take on something of a leadership role. The Standing Orders of the House of Commons cannot be amended—in the context I raised—unless the government agrees. The government's responses to the latest two reports you mentioned were poor. T

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  We're talking about a cycle—the supply cycle. The 1997 report contains a very nice chart, which explains the continuousness of the cycle. I would perhaps make small changes to it, but I will get back to that. There's no reason why, on June 1, you shouldn't look into the supply,

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau

Government Operations committee  —and pay the vice-chairs the same as a parliamentary secretary, because if you want MPs to invest part of their political career in an accountability exercise, then you're going to have to find a way to compensate that. The members of the committee should be paid the same as comm

April 2nd, 2012Committee meeting

Robert Marleau