Natural Resources committee  This is my personal view, my own opinion: The climate changes all the time. Personally, having looked into the whole subject matter, I think that the theory that carbon output caused by humans is causing catastrophic climate change is bogus. That's my answer.

Natural Resources committee  It's a heavily government-subsidized program to cure a problem that doesn't exist.

Natural Resources committee  It could be louder actually.

Natural Resources committee  Vaguely.... I'm not saying that the Atlantic accord can't be improved. There are areas where it could be improved for the benefit of the province and the country—

Natural Resources committee  —but this is not going to improve it. It's going to shred it and abrogate the Atlantic accord, and that's not in the interest of the country.

Natural Resources committee  That's somewhat of a rhetorical question. I'm against it because I'm a Canadian patriot.

Natural Resources committee  The accord has functioned more or less as intended, with some disputes along the way, which did get resolved. I think you—

Natural Resources committee  —referred earlier to the one between Prime Minister Harper and Premier Williams. That's not to say it can't be improved. I don't argue with that. This is not an improvement. This is an abrogation.

Natural Resources committee  That's a pretty hefty question. Mr. Small, as you're aware, I took a high-level approach to the bill. There's plenty of scope for getting into what might be more technical legal problems. One of them would be that we've just seen the Supreme Court of Canada—last year—shred Bil

Natural Resources committee  Thank you, Chair, for the opportunity to express my concerns about Bill C-49. I oppose the bill both as a citizen of Canada and as a resident of Newfoundland and Labrador, because it is a death blow to my province's ability to remain a contributing member of Canada. Honourabl