Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-9 of 9
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  The regulations are really of a very technical nature. They're in support of carrying out the authority that's going to provide it in the Judges Act.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  I think we're dealing with clause 35, the coming into force provision. Again, this is a minor technical amendment as a result of removing subclause 9(3) from the bill. We would now be renumbering the provisions. We also have the spousal employment assistance provision that we originally thought we would have to delay the coming into force of, but it has now been determined that there is no need to delay it.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  They are actually regulations in support of the division mechanism.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  They'll be made by the Governor in Council.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  The first amendment deals with the definition of annuity benefit. The purpose of redefining annuity benefit is to ensure that a spouse will receive a share of interest payable on a return of contributions in circumstances where the spouse is not eligible for a share of the annuity.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  The purpose of this set of amendments is to clarify the determination of a spouse's share when the judge is in receipt of an annuity by reason of infirmity or disability.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  In doing these series of amendments, we did not want to presume that the committee would pass every amendment. In the event that this amendment is passed, then there is no need to go on to the next amendment. That one is actually taken up within this amendment.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  The purpose of this motion is to propose a number of amendments to proposed section 52.22 of the bill, which provides the regulation-making authority in relation to the division mechanism. Again, because there are some additional amendments being made, it's going to change how some of the regulations will be drafted in support of the provision, and it was deemed an abundance of caution to make sure that the regulation-making authority would then nicely tie up with the new provision as amended in the bill.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy

Justice committee  Good afternoon. The first three sets of motions pertain to clause 9, which is the removal allowance. There's an existing entitlement for the judiciary to have assistance relocating to another part of Canada. In particular, territorial Supreme Court judges and the Federal Court, Tax Court, and Supreme Court of Canada judges have this assistance.

October 30th, 2006Committee meeting

Karen Cuddy