Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 211-225 of 271
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  The current minimum penalty is a fine of $600 for a first offence. Imprisonment the second time for a second offence is 14 days, and it's 90 days for a third or subsequent offence. Those are the existing minimums.

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  That's correct.

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  You'll certainly see the regulation that would allow us to incorporate by reference; you know, the International Association of Chiefs of Police norm 417-3--I'm making that up, obviously--as amended from time to time. So we'd be able to tell you what it looked like then, and if t

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  I would agree that this could happen. Certainly it wouldn't be any kind of secret we'd be pulling off, because we'd have to advise all the police officers in DRE that there has been this change. These changes are in fact proposed. They take anywhere from six months to 18 months,

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  I don't want to delay things, but I've just one point: the citizen who's charged is going to have to prove in court that they followed the prescribed steps, etc., and it's going to be what's prescribed at that time. Their lawyer will presumably get access to what the tests were i

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  When we deleted this section, we were guided in large measure by the advice we received from our regulation section when we advised them that there is a great deal of DRE material that may already exist under the International Association of Chiefs of Police and that gets amended

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  I certainly can't speak for all detachments in the country, but I do know that there are some very busy stations that do have video recording of breathalyzers, which can be very useful in court. They may have videos elsewhere. Parts of these tests take place in a darkened room. I

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  Yes, Mr. Hanger.

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  As it is currently written, the section stipulates that: (2) If a peace officer has reasonable grounds to suspect that a person has in the preceding three hours had alcohol or a drug in their body while they were operating a motor vehicle or vessel— The driver must meet two c

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  If I may, Mr. Hanger, obviously the first improvement in this is that we have the three hours instead of having the current law, that it's the person while operating. Under what we now propose, the police officer would have, in my view, a clear reason to believe that the person h

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  The level in the law, even as it exists today, which we are trying to amend in this bill, however it may come out of this committee, is a suspicion of alcohol in the body; it is not a suspicion of being impaired. It is only to get you to the approved screening device, which, if y

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  You are correct, but the person here would be capable of providing a sample on a breathalyzer.

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  The warrant only applies, yes--

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost

Justice committee  If I may, Mr. Chairman.

June 19th, 2007Committee meeting

Greg Yost