Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 111
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  Of course, but if we want to study the market dynamics, we cannot necessarily compare ourselves to the United States, because service providers in Canada are different, they are not the same.

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  The 25% is not guaranteed. There are industries—

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  As far as we are concerned, even at 25%, some industries said that it was not enough, nor even 30% or 40%. This is why the market share is not always a solution—

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  In our opinion, we should proceed as quickly as possible. This is why we proposed a test based on the elements of competition, namely the costs for the company, the rivalry on the market, as these are also reasonable factors for determining the level of competition in a market.

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  I suppose that that would be collusion, and we certainly do have tools for investigating such things.

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  But you are speaking of two competitors who turn into partners—

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  Not anywhere else. We have done—

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  The $15 million is a maximum amount. It's a cap. It cannot be more than $15 million. It would be up to the tribunal to determine what amount it could be. It could be $3 for that matter. It's anywhere from zero to $15 million. Bill C-41 has a number of criteria that the tribunal i

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  Well, they would probably have other things on their minds. If they were contemplating eliminating the competition, they might find people moving for re-regulation. So I suspect that would also act as a disincentive.

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  Well, I'd hate to say that I have enough, because I suspect that they'll come back again and again asking for more, so I don't want to limit my options at this stage. What I can tell you is that since 1986, the only consequence of breaching the abuse-of-dominance provisions has

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  No, my agency will be the same as it is now. I don't feel like a declawed cat.

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  No, I did not say that. I said that there had been cases. We do not have many of them, because the behaviour described under section 79 is favourable to competition, and provides the benefits of competition. This is why there are not many cases. We do not often prosecute, because

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  It would act as a deterrent. That's correct.

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  Do I think that deregulation is happening too quickly? Well, we don't yet have deregulation. This is a proposed test that has.... With respect to local telephony, if you're talking about that, we already have a number of telecommunications markets deregulated. I think Canadians h

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott

Industry committee  And I would say that I am like a terrier.

February 5th, 2007Committee meeting

Sheridan Scott