Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 91-105 of 146
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Information & Ethics committee  They don't know.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  I would say it's fine, it's perfectly legal, and it's okay if—if—they are getting proper consent. There are ways of doing proper opt-out consent, but our study shows they are not.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  The law is well behind the industry and the technology in this area, and it needs to catch up.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  We've actually recommended that this be treated as an offence and that there be a penalty for that.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  I don't think we've explicitly specified the penalty. It's something that needs to be further discussed, but we've said that should be subject to sanctions. Our recommendation nine suggests that the offences section be expanded. On data breach notification, our recommendation i

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  We have two different things here. We have the commissioner's orders and we have offences. Offences are prosecuted by the attorneys general.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  They would be treated as different categories. Those are not orders that the commissioner makes.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  Recommendations three to eleven in our submission are all about that.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  I can quickly run through them.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  We're saying that there are lots of things you can do here to improve the situation. You can make it easier for individuals to take cases to Federal Court, to get binding orders and damages where they have suffered damages. They should be protected from adverse cost awards in F

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  The CSA code has become PIPEDA. PIPEDA is the CSA code, basically.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  That's exactly it. PIPEDA is really just legislating good business practice that has been recognized by businesses. I can certainly say, for myself, that when we were coming up with these recommendations, I was taking the kinds of concerns you're raising now very much into consi

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  A lot of what's required here is just pure transparency. It's saying to businesses, tell the consumers what you're doing. Don't do it behind the scenes; tell them if you've had a data breach and that they might be the subject of identity theft. These are all pretty common-sense

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  I haven't thought about that.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson

Information & Ethics committee  Can I respond to the broader issue? The Alberta and B.C. models make the commissioners' findings final. They're not actually appealable to court.

December 6th, 2006Committee meeting

Philippa Lawson