Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 76-90 of 183
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I've seen some. “Quite a few” may be overstating it, but I have certainly seen some.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I actually think it's helpful, in the sense that I don't think the office as it's currently organized could in fact organize to cope with what I think would be a flood of requests for investigation, and even deciding which of those were trivial or not appropriate would take an en

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  No, I do not, but it may be a question of my own ignorance, as I haven't done a survey. The ones I'm familiar with do not, but that's all I can say.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  The highest I know of is two years. But I don't want to pretend I've done a survey. That would be inappropriate.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I don't know the answer to that question. I imagine it would be something they would take into account much more frequently now than they may have previously, but I don't know.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  The only point I want to make is that a great deal of this entire regime depends on the goodwill and honesty of the people involved in it. The whole review system of the confidential document depends on what people are telling us being actually the truth. We don't audit the docum

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  That's correct.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I have not made the comparison, so I can't respond to that question, although I'd be glad to get back to you on it.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I'm wondering if Ms. Robinson-Dalpé might comment on the salary question.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  That's correct.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  Since I am not the author of the code, I can't pretend to know exactly what the rationale is. When it was explained to me, I understood it to be a way of making sure that the office in a sense wasn't inundated by a number of requests that hadn't perhaps been examined carefully, t

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  It's very, very difficult to know, and I feel that we've been dancing on eggs, so to speak. We don't want to act as if we know what the law is going to be when we're not entirely sure.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I think it would probably be something in the area of $2 million to $3 million, because there are huge new data requirements, huge new reporting requirements, huge increases in the public registry. There are all these things that are indicated in law, many of which I think I'm qu

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  That's right. It also depends on whether the office includes the Senate, and there are all those other.... When I say that, it's assuming the full law passes more or less as it is.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro