Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 91-105 of 183
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Information & Ethics committee  I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Could you be a bit more clear?

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  Without using the term “philosophized”, I certainly have thought about how to organize in order to deal with the new legislation. My sense of it is that it doesn't require so much a change in process. I think many of our processes will stay the same; there will just be a lot more

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  My view is, if it's implied, it certainly won't hurt to state it, but you are right that no set of rules, no set of principles, will guarantee appropriate behaviour in the future. I don't think we've been served all that badly. I think most people who are public office holders, a

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  Then we can relax about the whole thing.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  Without comment on the very last comment, I do believe the currently proposed act is an advance in many ways.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I'm going to ask Lyne Robinson-Dalpé, who's in charge of financial arrangements in the office, to respond to that question.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  Not entirely, but these would primarily be new appointments to the office of a public office holder. We receive the confidential documents and then we try to make sure they've arranged their private affairs in a way that's suitable for their public responsibilities. That would be

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  I don't have an easy answer to that question, but you are quite right that I do have mixed views on the proposed legislation. There are many good things in it. For example, the definitions are better than they were before. It covers more people. It provides for more public infor

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  My jurisdiction is very limited--as I said before--much more limited than the title suggests. When the jurisdiction is limited to breaches of the code that would be applicable to any particular person, relative to inquiries, it would be further limited simply to ministers, secret

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  In any request for an investigation, my first response is always to know if it's within the powers that I have as the Ethics Commissioner. I don't want to try to decide in advance in a hypothetical situation whether or not that would be the case.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  There isn't any specific answer to the question you ask, in the sense that what might be kept confidential will differ d'un examen à l'autre, par exemple. What I do is reveal only enough information to support the conclusions I'm offering in the report. Remember that the investig

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  Yes, that's correct.

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro

Information & Ethics committee  The whole law does not apply to members of Parliament particularly because this is not the members' code; it's the public office holders' code. So it doesn't relate to what happens as a member of Parliament, or as a member of the Senate for that matter. My concern with Bill C-2,

September 20th, 2006Committee meeting

Bernard Shapiro