Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-8 of 8
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  If you look in the chapter--it would be in paragraph 1.3, I believe--there are four audits noted.

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten

Environment committee  That's correct.

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten

Environment committee  Yes, that's correct, Chair.

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten

Environment committee  I think our concern was that basically, on a project-by-project basis, the department is supposed to be able to say that there's no net loss of habitat. For these very large projects, when they can't say that for sure.... They're trying to develop this policy. As Mr. Maxwell wa

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten

Environment committee  No. In fact, what we say in the chapter is that the department uses different approaches for compensation, different ratios. In one region it may be one-to-one, and in another three-to-one, with a different measure. The department itself doesn't have one single model that it uses

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten

Environment committee  No, we didn't see that, but we do understand that there was an increase in fisheries officers previously. It's basically a reduction of those additional officers. That was also done with the idea that there would be habitat monitors in the habitat program itself who would be repl

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten

Environment committee  Thanks, Mr. Chair. The expenditures that DFO is spending on fish habitat have remained about the same for the last five years that we looked at.

May 26th, 2009Committee meeting

Eric Hellsten