Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 101
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Information & Ethics committee  I think that you've asked this question of legal counsel. Dan, would you respond?

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  First, I'd like to clarify one point. Faces and licence plates have been blurred for some time now. So we're not talking about that, but rather about other images that nevertheless constitute a concern for the individual in question. I don't know exactly how much time that would

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  I'm going to ask Dr. Patrick; perhaps he knows.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  I'm going to answer that question in two parts. We know the practices of two companies, Google and Canpages. To give you an example, those two companies reacted to the same problem in very different ways. Google undertook to speak with certain vulnerable groups in advance to ask

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  As a best practice, we have recommended that the organizations use these technologies to begin a dialogue with neighbourhood organizations to determine how this problem can be managed as a whole. Our proposed best practice is that this conversation be held with the communities in

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  I have a couple answers. Just to be clear, the commissioner was extremely concerned, so let me not understate that. The commissioner was extremely concerned, which is why she initiated this complaint right off the mark.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  No, I just want to be clear and fair in my representation on her behalf. She was first off the mark to initiate a complaint, has led a speedy investigation to get to the heart of the matter, and has in a precedent-setting way said, “I don't want just undertakings that you're goi

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  That was in the investigation report. Part of the investigator's job is to assess credibility, and that was the outcome.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  I will repeat my understanding, and then I will ask Dr. Patrick to say it in better terms than I can. There are two things. There are the publicly broadcast Wi-Fi signals that they knew they were picking up, and they intended to pick up. What they did not know was that in that c

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  My understanding is they've been collecting the Wi-Fi signals for about a year.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  Our understanding is that they had no knowledge that they were picking up payload data, let alone personal data, which is what our investigation uncovered.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  I'll ask Mâitre Caron to confirm, but my understanding is that our contact person for this investigation, particularly near the latter end of the investigation, was their legal counsel, David Fraser.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  Yes, he is based in the Atlantic region at McInnes Cooper.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

Information & Ethics committee  Just to be clear, David Fraser is their external legal counsel. Maybe that's a question you can clarify with Google, so I don't misspeak.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Patricia Kosseim