Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 60
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  I was only going to say that the scope of the bill doesn't change between its study in committee and its consideration in the House at report stage, so an amendment that can't be made in committee with respect to scope can't be made at report stage either.

March 15th, 2012Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Environment committee  There are two reasons for amending an interpretation clause. One is to clarify something that's in the bill. The other is to make a substantive change to a definition that is required because of amendments that have been made to the bill. What the chair was saying is that, beca

December 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Environment committee  Yes, something like that.

December 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Finance committee  It is that Bill C-470 in clause 1 be amended by replacing line 5 on page 2 with the following: (b) the Minister shall, unless otherwise justified, make available to the That Bill C-470, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 2 with the following: (b) the minister

December 8th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Environment committee  Clause 2 is the interpretation clause of the bill. There are only limited circumstances in which amendments to the interpretation clause are admissible. One of those conditions is that changes have been made to the bill that require amendment of the interpretation clause. We ca

December 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Environment committee  Amendments to the interpretation clause are ordinarily only admissible as a result of changes made to the bill or to clarify the interpretation clause, but not with respect to other legislation.

December 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

December 1st, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Citizenship and Immigration committee  My view was that the BQ amendment was simply an attempt to clarify the content of clause 2, or proposed subsection 91(2). It's a question of clarification, not a question of expansion.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Citizenship and Immigration committee  We haven't come to those parts of the bill yet.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Citizenship and Immigration committee  This would be paragraph (b) of amendment G-1.

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Would you like me to read the amendment so that everyone is clear on what they're voting on?

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

November 15th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Justice committee  That's another question--

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Justice committee  I believe the bill should be referred back to the Senate.

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole

Justice committee  That Bill S-215, in clause 1, be amended by replacing in the French version, line 7 on page 1, with the following: (1.2) Il est entendu que l'attentat suicide à la bombe

October 28th, 2010Committee meeting

Wayne Cole