Justice committee  That Bill S-215, in clause 1, be amended by replacing in the French version, long title, page 1, with the following: Loi modifiant le Code criminel, (attentats suicides à la bombe)

Justice committee  No, it should be “à la bombe”.

Transport committee  Okay. It would read, “The government shall review the definition of library materials in proposed subparagraph 19(1)(g.1) every 10 years.”

Transport committee  The difficulty with saying “Parliament” is it's not clear whether it's the House and the Senate or the House or the Senate.

Transport committee  It would be “Parliament shall review the definition of library materials in proposed paragraph 19(1)(g.1) every 10 years.”

Transport committee  The committee would really need to consult the legislative drafter, which I am not. The section that is being discussed.... These are amendments to the regulation-making power of Canada Post Corporation provided for in the statute. It's not clear to me that this is the best place

Transport committee  --to express an opinion.

Transport committee  If the regulations section, and the only amendment is to review one of the regulations—part of the regulations. I would presume it could be put at the end of the regulations section.

Transport committee  It would have to be a new clause at the end of the section, so it would have to be a clause separate from the amendment that you have moved, G-3. It would become a new clause.

Transport committee  Just a moment. We need to have the committee agree to the exact wording. It's not enough to just agree to the idea.

Transport committee  Hang on just a minute. We don't have any wording yet.

Transport committee  You can't say “the legislation”. You have to make it “this legislation”, which is going to disappear because these are amendments to the Canada Post Act. Is it “review after 10 years?”

Transport committee  Could you just read again what it is they're voting on?

Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  The bill seeks to respond to the decision of the court of appeal in the McIvor case, and the provisions of the bill, as approved by the House at second reading, are limited strictly to making the necessary changes to the act. The advice has been given that attempts to extend that

Finance committee  If it's not the will of the committee and they dispute it, they can debate the motion.