Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee They were defeated.
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee Amendment BQ-2 was adopted.
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee G-1, as it was submitted to the committee, deals only with the English language of the text. Am I to understand that the committee wishes also to amend the French version of paragraph (m) by including the word “notamment”—
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee —as was done in the earlier amendments?
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee Okay, thank you.
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee Yes, BQ-7 was withdrawn. We're now on G-6.
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee Could I get some clarification, please? The amendment to G-2 was to remove the words “in a community near” and replace them with “related to”, and in French, the addition of the word “notamment” after “d'argent” in the second paragraph. I don't have any difficulty with the word
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee So we take out the words “in or near”.
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee It's G-5.1
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Environment committee No. Those have been defeated. So it's just clause 26.
May 7th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Natural Resources committee It's just an amendment to the English text of the bill.
April 28th, 2009Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Transport committee He's talking about the next motion, which will substitute text, and that's what he wants to amend. But we have to deal with the first one before we get to it.
June 6th, 2006Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Transport committee There is a royal recommendation attached to this bill, which governs expenditures made in accordance with it. The appointment of a commission would entail additional expenditure, and that's not covered by the current royal recommendation.
June 6th, 2006Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Transport committee If it’s optional or mandatory, it does not have any impact. Furthermore, even though the commissioners may not be paid, there would have to be administrative costs. Bill C-3 is not what gives the minister the power to appoint commissioners, but other acts.
June 6th, 2006Committee meeting
Wayne Cole
Transport committee With respect to amendment NDP-3, it would require the consent of the municipality. That goes contrary to the principle of the bill, which is basically to provide for the Governor in Council to have the authority to issue relevant permissions. A veto given to the municipality goes
June 6th, 2006Committee meeting
Wayne Cole