Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Citizenship and Immigration committee Of course they may. We know there are some cases where they pay $50,000 U.S. to get aboard an aircraft destined to Canada. We are the country of choice for human smuggling.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
James Bissett
Citizenship and Immigration committee The primary one is the one that we had in the 1989 legislation. This is that certain countries are listed as safe for refugees; they are a safe country of origin. If you're coming from a country, as I said, that's democratic, that follows the rule of law, that's a signatory to th
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
James Bissett
Citizenship and Immigration committee I wonder if I could make a comment on Mr. St-Cyr's question.
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
James Bissett
Citizenship and Immigration committee I think it's important to realize that if the enactment of the new appeal section came into effect, it simply means a paper review. It's not a de novo hearing. There can be no new facts presented, no new evidence presented. Someone reviews the paper decision that was made by the
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
James Bissett
Citizenship and Immigration committee On the security issue, I'm inclined to agree: very few asylum seekers have been found to be terrorists. But some have, and one of them, of course, is the famous “Millennium Bomber“, Ahmed Ressam, who came here as an asylum claimant from Algeria. He didn't even bother to appear be
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
James Bissett
Citizenship and Immigration committee Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Our asylum system is really in a mess. It doesn't serve the needs of genuine refugees, it's enormously expensive, it encourages and rewards human smuggling, it presents our country with a serious security risk, it undermines our immigration pro
October 8th, 2009Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee The selection criteria today are still in the point system, but the factors of selection have changed over the years. I think the most fundamental change, which I don't think was a good one, was the tremendous emphasis given to education as opposed to skills and occupations. It m
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee No, not necessarily. My problem is that if we're going to increase immigration levels next year to 265,000, and deal with the backlog, it's going to be a difficult task to do that. My own view is that I almost would declare, perhaps, a moratorium on new cases, except for highly
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee No, no, that's right. It would require a major change.
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee Yes, and it would require many additional staff, I would suggest, too.
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee I think the additional staff are implied with the additional $27 million over two years. I understand the minister is planning to use that money to have additional officers deal with the backlog.
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee That's the problem with the current act. You can't stop it, because section 11 of the act--I think it is--says that if the people meet the requirements, they shall be accepted. As I said, prior to the 2001 act, there were many people who met most of the selection criteria, but we
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee I don't know how they do it, but they do it. It may be because the states in Australia may not have that power. Maybe it's a federal government power to license professionals in Australia.
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee I beg your pardon?
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett
Finance committee Certainly they don't let in as many immigrants as we do. That's true. As you know, the licensing of professions and trades is a provincial responsibility, and that's part of the problem here.
May 14th, 2008Committee meeting
James Bissett