Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee There are two areas. The first, as I mentioned, is the ecoENERGY renewable program. Solar is certainly eligible under that program for power generation. Its eligibility may be slightly theoretical, because to the best of my knowledge, it won't be competitive with other renewable
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee It would not be built into the business-as-usual forecast. We certainly think it's an extremely promising technology to reduce emissions and in fact to reconcile--and this is a little bit to Mr. Bigras' point--the emissions that come from the production of fossil fuels with our e
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee If I understand the question correctly, I think you have identified a real issue--namely, how do you ensure that the grid is capable of accepting as much renewable power as possible? There are questions about codes and standards and so on. The department is doing some work in t
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee The key program in that respect is the ecoENERGY renewable program, in which the government committed $1.5 billion to support 4,000 megawatts of additional renewable capacity. That would include wind but also small-scale hydro, biomass, potentially geothermal, and so on. In add
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee That is a question for Environment Canada because it has to do with the regulatory framework.
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee Was I personally consulted, or was Natural Resources Canada consulted?
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee Yes, I believe our communications people were consulted. That's my understanding.
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee I don't think it does in this chart. This chart refers purely to the regulatory program.
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee I'm not sure I understand the question.
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee Mr. Godfrey, I'd have to say that I'd be happy to get back to you with the detailed numbers on what the projections are. I don't have those numbers with me. I must say that 29 megatonnes sounds a bit high to me, but I'll certainly check into it and get back to you, if that would
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee We were consulted, along with other departments, with some frequency as the plan was being developed. Rather than characterizing it as fulsome or frequent or substantial, I did check my agenda and I counted 11 meetings at the ADM level through January and February--so roughly ove
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee The figure that sticks in my mind is roughly 4% to 5%. Today that figure would grow over time as the oil sands expanded.
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee Appearances can be deceiving, Mr. Chairman. I'll defer to—
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown
Environment committee Mr. Chairman, I have to apologize--
May 16th, 2007Committee meeting
Howard Brown