Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-7 of 7
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  So as far as I understand, the order of the last four meetings is based on who can show up, the availability of witnesses, but I have an update on the Kyoto process, mechanisms, and target setting, which would bring in the modelling, I think, that Mr. Cullen.... The modelling wil

November 2nd, 2006Committee meeting

Tim Williams

Environment committee  Sure, I wouldn't mind having some clarification that I've got it right as well.

November 2nd, 2006Committee meeting

Tim Williams

Environment committee  As I understand it, we have the first meeting on the urgency of the situation--why this bill has been tabled in the first place. The second meeting is on the impacts of doing something and the impacts of not doing anything. Those are the two extremes, I guess.

November 2nd, 2006Committee meeting

Tim Williams

Environment committee  Economic and social impacts.

November 2nd, 2006Committee meeting

Tim Williams

Environment committee  I would imagine so, yes. The third meeting and I think the next two meetings--those first two meetings seem to be--

November 2nd, 2006Committee meeting

Tim Williams

Environment committee  As far as I understand it, none have actually made it, finally, onto the virtual elimination list. Only hexachlorobutadiene has been proposed.

May 17th, 2006Committee meeting

Tim Williams

Environment committee  There are two reports that I think you have to take into consideration. One is the initial examination review of the 1988 act. That was done in 1995. In that case, yes, there would have been a government response to it. The second report is a large package of amendments to thei

May 10th, 2006Committee meeting

Tim Williams