Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Transport committee Yes, we are, and we agreed with their comments. In their comments they identify that the finance toll issues were the ones that were completely supported by their members. That's why they spoke on those issues only, and in their comments they indicated that individual owners woul
May 30th, 2006Committee meeting
Dan Stamper
Transport committee The State of Michigan held hearings similar to what you're holding here today over a period of about a month and a half, took testimony from witnesses, and within a week of finishing that testimony both the House and Senate passed resolutions taking away funding for the direct st
May 30th, 2006Committee meeting
Dan Stamper
Transport committee I called Mr. Hicks when I read Bill C-3 and asked what the intent of Bill C-3 was. I got an explanation that the deputy minister was concerned about security and...maintenance, health, and safety issues. I said to Mr. Hicks that Bill C-3 went way beyond that and asked why he di
May 30th, 2006Committee meeting
Dan Stamper
Transport committee Politically, the State of Michigan has withdrawn funding for the DRIC. I don't know what the ultimate reaction of that is with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, with Transport Canada, and with the Ontario Ministry of Transportation. It was a four-party effort. I believe
May 30th, 2006Committee meeting
Dan Stamper
Transport committee My name is Dan Stamper. I'm president of the Ambassador Bridge.
May 30th, 2006Committee meeting
Dan Stamper
Transport committee Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you to all the members of the committee for this much desired opportunity to speak today on the proposed legislation governing international border crossings between Canada and the United States. First, let me say we are concerned with the intent
May 30th, 2006Committee meeting
Dan Stamper