Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 106-120 of 122
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  If I may, I have just two things. As public servants, we endeavour to provide parliamentarians evidence of what government is getting for the money. When it comes to registration, frankly, it hasn't been in place long enough to be very definitive about that. We can tell you the e

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  I'm still employed. I have recently been appointed the deputy commissioner and chief operating officer of the Canada Revenue Agency, which is the organization for which I worked up until three years ago, when I was asked to go to firearms.

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  The year in question is year two. The one year, I think everyone acknowledges, was an error in accounting in a large department, which is understandable--

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  The one in 2003-04 occurred under my watch when I was commissioner. There was certainly absolutely no intention to mislead Parliament at all. As indicated in the Auditor General's report, there is a chronology of events around that so-called error in 2003-04. The Canada Firearm

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  With pleasure. You raised several things here. First of all, in terms of your own particular situation, I'm sure the officials in the centre would be pleased to ascertain or make a determination as to whether something needs to be corrected.

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  The second point you raised relates to the degree to which police can rely on the information in the registry. As I pointed out earlier and has been identified in the Auditor General's report, we acknowledge that the data in the registry is not perfect. I can say, though, that th

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  In terms of the announcements that have recently been made by Minister Day on the Firearms Centre, those are matters completely of government discretion around policy and expenditure, which is the entitlement of governments to make. What I can say is that however the program evol

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  I can't be precise on that, except that I can frame it for you. If you look at the budget for the year just completed, which was for a little over $82 million for the entire Canada Firearms Centre, including all of the licensing, safety training, registration, and so on, somethin

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  I think, in fairness, the firearms program and the registry have been used somewhat interchangeably to describe the program. We, the officials who work in the Firearms Centre, have a narrow definition of the registry as the component dealing with the registration of firearms. It

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  Certainly, Madam Chair. The system is by no means perfect to verify firearms, but I wouldn't qualify it as completely inadequate either. To understand how this works, if I may take a moment, first of all there's a central registry where all of the firearms registration informati

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  Some of it is done over the phone, but for the last while we've been attempting to do as many physical verifications as possible. We rely on a volunteer system. It isn't perfect, but it is affordable.

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  No. Bear in mind too that the vast majority of verifications are done by gun dealers and gunsmiths in this country. There isn't one who isn't a verifier, because it's their business. When that person calls the Firearms Centre to say they wish to register this particular handgun t

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. The previous regime is commonly referred to as the FAC, the firearms acquisition certificate system. That system had been in place for many years. It operated off a different system, the restricted weapons registration system, the RWRS. The passage of th

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  As people's firearms acquisition certificates expired, they had to acquire a firearms licence under the new act. As they acquired a licence, the data was migrated. The old data is available for investigative purposes, but it was not integrated with the new data.

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker

Government Operations committee  Very briefly, there are two systems. First of all, members should understand that there's one that's been in place since the outset of the program. We refer to that as CFIS I, the Canadian Firearms Information System I. It remains the operating system for the Canada Firearms Cent

May 30th, 2006Committee meeting

William Baker