Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Procedure and House Affairs committee On documentation for protecting against fraud, I agree something needs to happen that's a bit better than just saying who you are. I agree with that; I just don't want it to become so onerous that we're actually disenfranchising people. I'm sure we can find ways amongst us to fig
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Procedure and House Affairs committee Of course, as you might imagine, we agree with our brief.
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Procedure and House Affairs committee In terms of its debts, just to be clear, a riding can of course embark upon the debt to begin with. But at the end of the day, the expenses—not necessarily a loan of that nature—must all be paid by the candidate, who can have unpaid claims up to 18 months after an election. All o
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Procedure and House Affairs committee Definitely. It would be useful to have proof of identity. I'm not sure about the kind of proof that should be requested or the scope that should be attached to this requirement. Some people don't have the necessary pieces of identification. In some cases, they may provide only a
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Procedure and House Affairs committee With respect to the role of deputy returning officers, it isn't just a matter of bingo cards. All the parties admit that we have to be able to verify voters' identities and to ensure that those voters indeed have to vote at that place. We don't want to eliminate deputy returning
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Procedure and House Affairs committee Thank you very much. The NDP agrees on a number of the views previously expressed. In our view, if we could implement Mr. Kingsley's recommendations on the advance registration of candidates, we would solve half a dozen problems. I don't see why we couldn't do it, if we all agre
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Procedure and House Affairs committee My name is Éric Hébert, and I'm from the New Democratic Party.
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee We do actually keep a percentage, because when you process a credit card donation there's a percentage and those sorts of things. Would I consider that to be part of the contribution? Well, that's a very good question, one that I hadn't fully considered. But I would say given the
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee On the issue of loans, particularly, one of the big problems that I think exists right now in the Elections Act is that a loan that is given by somebody outside of a financial institution and goes into default after 18 months is then deemed a contribution. You can get extensions
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee I entirely agree: ways will have to be found to ensure that funds come from the people who say they are contributing. Furthermore, the passage of Bill C-24 added a section to the Elections Act providing that it is an offence to attempt to circumvent an aspect of the act. That sec
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee I would like to come to the question around conventions. To me, a political party has a responsibility to its membership to have a democratic process, and that democratic process does not have to be, as far as I'm concerned, completely offloaded onto the people who participate th
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee Sure. I will simply end the presentation on two final items. The last thing we would particularly like to see in this legislation is something along the lines of a limit on leadership spending in leadership campaigns. We believe this is something of a bit of a problem in our sy
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert
Bill C-2 (39th Parliament, 1st Session) committee Thank you very much. In our view, this bill is really a step in the right direction. We see once again the extent of participation by unions and businesses in the political system. That's the reason why, in discussions on Bill C-24, we proposed that the $1,000 amount be complete
June 1st, 2006Committee meeting
Eric Hébert