Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
International Trade committee Thank you for that question. The deposits started being made in 2002. The Canadian dollar was not as valuable then as it is now, but the money was handed over to the U.S. Treasury then and held all that time. As it comes back, it comes back against the very highly appreciated Ca
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee Apart from the settlement in Mexican cement, I'm not aware of any agreements like this one where money held in the U.S. Treasury as a cash deposit against projected customs duties was later returned at a much later date, subject to an agreement. That is, money does come back, but
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee As the chairman indicated, I'm not here to address the agreement per se. If you invest and you get it wrong on a currency exchange, that's your own risk. I believe Canadian tax law recognizes that. But here, there was no investment made. You weren't at your own risk. The money
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee You may have opted to consider it the other way, but that didn't happen.
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee I think in instances where your money has been held against your will and it's been found that it never should have been held in the first place and you're entitled to get it back, the tax law ought to recognize the problem.
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee No, I don't.
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee I could certainly arrange to do that.
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee I have no idea of that either. I'm sorry.
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee I'm their counsel.
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee Three minutes, roughly.
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee It contains provisions to ensure that illegal actions of the United States Department of Commerce are not expressly endorsed by the Government of Canada and this Parliament, and that private companies deprived of access to dispute resolution within the agreement are not abandoned
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'm appearing on behalf of the Free Trade Lumber Council. I'm pleased to appear before the committee as it deliberates over the implementation of the softwood lumber agreement. I want to express my personal gratitude for the scheduling adjustment that
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee On your second question, the agreement sets out now the terms of U.S. law. It says that once there's a notice for the liquidation of the entries, within six months Customs needs to repay the money. That liquidation notice is to follow within 10 days of a final court decision sayi
August 21st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee If there's no agreement, I think you'll have to complete the period of appeal under the Court of Appeal, so I think you're 12 months away—
August 21st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman
International Trade committee —but at 12 months away you'll get two years' of the money and all of the interest immediately, and then you'll see the rest of it come in, and it'll be 100%, accumulating interest until the date it's returned. Under the terms of the agreement, interest stops on the effective da
August 21st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. Elliot Feldman