Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-4 of 4

Environment committee  If I understood properly, what you said was that if you start to create other categories, for instance, then you would slow down the process. Our position is the opposite, that if you don't spend your time debating the toxic/non-toxic issue so much and you get to the point of wha

September 26th, 2006Committee meeting

Al Hamilton

Environment committee  I just have one comment. Salt is kind of in limbo. It hasn't been listed; there's a recommendation made, but it hasn't been listed. What we've heard from people, though, is that if it were listed there would be a lot of pressure to stop using salt in some places, even though that

September 26th, 2006Committee meeting

Al Hamilton

Environment committee  I have just one point. If the real goal is to improve the environment, I think that either removing “toxic” or creating some other category to put things in so you're not arguing about that all the time would definitely speed up the process of getting things done, because then yo

September 26th, 2006Committee meeting

Al Hamilton

Environment committee  On behalf of Canada's salt industry, I'd like to thank the committee for giving us the opportunity to tell our story and to make some recommendations that we feel would make CEPA more efficient and effective. The salt industry experience with CEPA really started in 1995, when we

September 26th, 2006Committee meeting

Al Hamilton