Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 134667
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act   process that needs to go on. At committee, all we heard from witnesses, one after the other, was that they were not consulted. This is particularly true of people who are in the fishing industry, which as we know is the absolute staple industry of Atlantic Canada

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Jeremy PatzerConservative

Committees of the House   Republic of China”. Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to this report. We thank the clerk, the analysts, the witnesses and all the members who contributed to this report.

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Lloyd LongfieldLiberal

Canada—Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act   to speak with the people on the ground except during committee meetings, when witnesses were called. I totally agree that it would have been better to have a much more robust consultation process than we actually did.

May 2nd, 2024House debate

Mario SimardBloc

Justice committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. Actually, that's kind of a shocking and troubling development. Should this legislation pass, it would be a big mistake, based on the testimony we heard around parents and around teachers in particular. Even the Liberals' own witnesses came

April 29th, 2024Committee meeting

Rob MooreConservative

Environment committee   and climate change. In the motion establishing this study, it says that the committee wishes to invite co‑operatives to testify. However, no co‑op has been suggested for the witness list, so I would ask each party to send the clerk their suggestions, prioritized as usual, to make the task

April 30th, 2024Committee meeting

The Chair Liberal

Justice committee  That's right. What we have is a bill that the proponent is advertising and justifying using scenarios that are already criminal. The concern that witnesses have and the concern that the Minister of Justice, Arif Virani, has is the effect of passing this bill on conduct

April 29th, 2024Committee meeting

Rob MooreConservative

National Strategy on Brain Injuries Act   colleague today when he talked about the experience he had with a particular friend whom he played hockey with, the realities of brain injuries and what he witnessed someone close to him go through. Quite frankly, I think it is time that we get to the point where we can send the bill

May 1st, 2024House debate

Mark GerretsenLiberal

Justice committee  ? No. Those very scenarios have gone before the courts, and the teacher's defence and the reason the teacher was not convicted criminally, is section 43. That is why teachers' organizations appeared at this committee and sat there as witnesses and testified that removing section 43

April 29th, 2024Committee meeting

Rob MooreConservative

Amendments to the Standing Orders  Mr. Speaker, I am quite encouraged by the member's motion. However, there are a number of questions and thoughts I would like to share with the member. To start off, we have to look at what we have witnessed over the years, or at least what I have witnessed, which

April 29th, 2024House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Industry committee   and Data Protection Tribunal Act and the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other Acts. With that, I’d like to welcome back our witnesses and thank you all for being here this evening. We welcome Mr. Mark Schaan, senior assistant

May 1st, 2024Committee meeting

The Chair Liberal

Justice committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. Section 43, as we heard from witnesses, provides a defence for certain actions that could otherwise be criminal. It pertains specifically to—this isn't interpretation, since it's in the plain reading of the legislation—schoolteachers and parents

April 29th, 2024Committee meeting

Rob MooreConservative

Points of Order  Madam Speaker, I gave notice to the table regarding this point of order following what we witnessed this afternoon and the Speaker's decisions, which were good decisions. I want to start by saying that the rules have to apply to all in the House of Commons, and what we saw

April 30th, 2024House debate

Peter JulianNDP

Employment Insurance Act   of adoption, there are some tragic stories. For parents who make that choice to adopt kids who maybe have been in and out of foster care and have witnessed horrible, terrible circumstances in their short lives, it takes a long time to build trust. We heard about a number of young people

April 30th, 2024House debate

Scott AitchisonConservative

Employment Insurance Act  Madam Speaker, one thing I have witnessed over the years is a general attitude toward how we can improve our EI system and how benefits are ultimately paid out. We often talk about what is being proposed in this legislation. For adoptive parents to have 15 weeks, from my

April 30th, 2024House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Environment committee   that this is not sufficient? Nobody has said in any of this debate that this is not sufficient. I don't think anybody here in this room is qualified to tell us if this is sufficient. We need to get in expert witnesses. The other thing is that this document does have variables. It has 44 sectors

April 30th, 2024Committee meeting

The ChairLiberal