It would be too bad if they were unfairly treated. I think the idea behind it is that everybody would be fairly treated. The idea of the fund that Konrad and I put forward is that it would be distributed, notwithstanding the exclusions I mentioned, on a per capita basis, per journalist. It wouldn't matter how many you had. You would get the same number per journalist that you had.
For the small weeklies, I'm afraid it's not a very happy economic outlook in terms of the transition to the Internet and that sort of stuff. I don't think there's a great deal of a future for print. I think the focus of funding, where it does occur, should be on helping news organizations adapt to the future to build strong digital platforms. This is where the fair compensation or fair dealing with big web companies can come into play on the power imbalance and that sort of thing. That's why a fund works for the little guys.
I don't want to get too long-winded about it, but that would be too bad for the little guys. They should be treated fairly. We need to encourage the innovators and entrepreneurs during a time of transition like this, and not just prop up failed old business models from large companies that are unable or unwilling to adapt.