Evidence of meeting #112 for Canadian Heritage in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cbc.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

John Gormley  Lawyer, Retired radio talk show host and Former Member of Parliament, As an Individual
Tara Henley  Journalist, Author, Podcaster, As an Individual
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Geneviève Desjardins
Brent Jolly  President, Canadian Association of Journalists
Sarah Andrews  Director, Government and Media Relations, Friends of Canadian Media

5:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

You raise an important point, Mr. Champoux. This money did not come from Canadian Heritage. I don't think that SSHRC is funded by Canadian Heritage; I think it's funded by ISED. Therefore, the question here is this: Who funded the motion, and is this motion appropriate at this committee?

I am going to try to find that out, because nobody's sure who funded the motion. I don't know if anybody has any information to offer on who funded this and on whether it is Canadian Heritage or ISED that funds the research councils.

As we know, ISED funds research councils, so that is an important question that you raise, and I think we need to get that answer. I don't know that the clerk can tell me, and I'm putting her in a difficult position, because the motion in itself, even though it was tabled a while ago, doesn't really ensure that it was Canadian Heritage that was responsible for this money. I think that if it is not Canadian Heritage, then this motion is going to be inadmissible in this particular committee.

Go ahead, Ms. Lattanzio.

5:55 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Madam Chair, I believe I still had the floor.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Do you still have the floor?

All right, go ahead.

5:55 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

I'd like to address another point that I find interesting. Again, I have no problem with the spirit of the motion. We do have to make sure that public funds go to organizations that meet the required criteria. However, I believe that if we open this discussion, we should open it up more broadly. There are other groups that are targeted as well. I think other groups targeted by hate speech should perhaps be included. Of course, we can discuss that when we see if the motion can be debated at this committee.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

I think that that's a question that we're going to have to ask.

Ms. Lattanzio, did you want to speak—

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Yes.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

—to answer this question?

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

I want to speak on—

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

I have a list, and you can go on the list, or if you have an answer to Mr. Champoux's question, I would entertain it.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Yes, it's—

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Otherwise, I would have to go to Mr. Lawrence.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

Yes, it would be with regard to to Mr. Champoux's comments.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

It's a point of information. All right. Go ahead.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

For my part, I too understand the spirit of this motion, Madam Chair, but I would agree with my colleague. Up until such time as we have the certainty as to who—

February 27th, 2024 / 5:55 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON

I have a point of order, and then I want to give you the opportunity to respond.

I think that was fair, Madam Chair, but it's clear that this was a point of debate at this point. I don't mean any disrespect, but I was next on the list, and you could go to the list.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

No, I don't think it's a point of debate. Mr. Champoux asked a question. I did not have the answer. The clerk did not have the answer. Ms. Lattanzio says that she has the answer, so I'm giving her the opportunity to answer.

5:55 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

I have a point of order.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

I don't have the answer. What I'm saying is that I—

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

You're saying that you don't have the answer.

5:55 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

I do have a point of order.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

Excuse me. Yes, go ahead, Mrs. Thomas.

5:55 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Thank you.

Madam Chair, when the chair is asked a question, it is for the chair to answer. Ms. Lattanzio just said that she doesn't have the answer. Therefore, she is ceding that it is in fact debate.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

She told me initially that she was answering Mr. Champoux's question. I listened to that. She now says that she doesn't have an answer, so I'm going to rule her out of order. I'm the chair, and I think I can follow the rules quite nicely, thank you.

Ms. Lattanzio, you have to go after Mr. Lawrence in the lineup. Thank you.

Philip, you have the floor. Thank you.

I think I don't need you to remind me about the rules, Mrs. Thomas. You tend to do that a lot, because—

5:55 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

Madam Chair, I have a point of order.

5:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Hedy Fry

I know what the rules are, and you second-guess everything that people do. You literally second-guess everything. Ms. Lattanzio originally said that she had an answer. Now she says that she doesn't, so I have done the appropriate thing and have given Mr. Lawrence the floor.

Philip, go ahead.