This area definitely needs some light, and this is a non-partisan approach. We're from different political parties, but I honestly say that my colleague Madame Guarnieri has really shown that something has to be done. All of the presentations today and all of the different attempts to say that there's this security issue or there's that, and “don't do this to us, this will hurt”, have convinced me more than ever that she's right. My support for this is a lot stronger at the end of this exercise than it was at the beginning.
I would like to ask Madame Anderson to give me an explanation of one thing she mentioned. She said, and I quote, that the clause that would be left in this statute would be “interfering with the ability to raise money”. Is it a fair interpretation that the disclosure of the top salaries would interfere? That was your expression, but maybe it came at the end of your presentation.