Evidence of meeting #26 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Myron Roth  Industry Specialist, Aquaculture and Seafood, Policy and Industry Competitiveness Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, Government of British Columbia

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Leef Conservative Yukon, YT

It is, Mr. Chair.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Mr. Leef, please move your motion at this time.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Leef Conservative Yukon, YT

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

It might sound strikingly similar to a motion we already heard today. I figure I might as well bring it forward today, before Mr. MacAulay brings it forward on Wednesday and we have three identical motions.

My motion is that because the evidence demonstrates that the Canadian seal hunt is conducted humanely and sustainably, the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans reaffirms its support for the Canadian seal industry.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Thank you, Mr. Leef. Do you want to make any opening comments?

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Leef Conservative Yukon, YT

I'll be brief with this and then open the floor if anybody has additional comments.

From a personal perspective, coming from the Yukon territory, I'm a firm supporter of traditional activities that are sustainable, humane, and support the livelihood of thousands of Canadians. I come from a geographic region that has a strong tradition and heritage in the trapping industry. I have observed some of the challenges that industry has faced over the years, and I now see that starting to press up against people who are involved in the sealing industry.

I think it's an important motion that the committee consider—particularly around the heritage, tradition, and culture it provides Canadians—that it is a sustainable harvest, it is conducted humanely, and it supports the livelihood of Canadians.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Thank you, Mr. Leef.

You've heard the motion presented to the committee. You've heard Mr. Leef's opening comments.

Mr. MacAulay.

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

I'd like to propose an amendment to the motion.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Please state your amendment, Mr. McAulay.

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

I would add the following:

and that, given the current state of the Canadian sealing industry and the inability of the government to open new international markets for the industry, the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans call on the government to significantly increase its efforts to protect and promote the sealing industry on the international stage, before the industry is permanently lost.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Do you have that in front of you, Mr. MacAulay, so I can provide it to the clerk?

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Leef Conservative Yukon, YT

It's just a minor adjustment.

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Allen Conservative Tobique—Mactaquac, NB

I can't imagine that dog's going to hunt. Nice try, though.

4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

4:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

You've heard the motion, and you've heard Mr. MacAulay's amendment to the motion.

Mr. Toone.

5 p.m.

NDP

Philip Toone NDP Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC

Do we have a timeline as to when the industry will be permanently lost?

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

No, there's no timeline.

5 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

We disagree with the premise of the amendment, which is that the government is not actively working on the expansion of markets. We know for a fact that this is happening, so we will not be supporting this amendment.

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

Thank you, Mr. Kamp.

Mr. MacAulay.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

I bring this amendment to the floor because I want more activity from the Government of Canada. I think after the China trip we were all disappointed. It's okay to promote and support the sealing industry, but if you do not have markets you have no industry. What we have to do is encourage the government. I would urge the government members on the committee to support this motion, because all it does is encourage the government to become more active in seeking new markets. If we cannot sell the seal pelts there will be no sealing industry.

I could not possibly see anybody interested in the sealing industry not supporting my amendment to this motion.

5 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Kamp Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC

Well you're going to see it.

5 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

5 p.m.

Liberal

Lawrence MacAulay Liberal Cardigan, PE

Mr. Chair, I missed that statement.

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

It was inaudible.

Is there anything further on the amendment?

Mr. Donnelly.

5 p.m.

NDP

Fin Donnelly NDP New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC

Can we hear that one more time?

5 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rodney Weston

I will read it into the record one more time.

Mr. Leef has moved that because the evidence demonstrates that the Canadian seal hunt is conducted humanely and sustainably, the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans reaffirms its support for the Canadian seal industry.

The amendment brought forward by Mr. MacAulay states: and that, given the current state of the Canadian sealing industry and the inability of the government to open new international markets for the industry, the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans call on the government to significantly increase its efforts to protect and promote the sealing industry on the international stage, before the industry is permanently lost.

That's the amendment and the motion.

Is there anything further on the amendment?

(Amendment negatived)

The amendment has been defeated.

We will now return to the original motion as stated by Mr. Leef. Is there discussion on the motion?

Mr. Kamp.