Once we form an opinion, and once we have an opinion that actually makes sense to the diaspora...because if you think about the round table idea or the communications idea, one of the ideas that are going to affect Canadian citizens is that we want harmony among the people of Sri Lankan descent who live in Canada, whether they emigrated directly from that country or were born here, and we want harmony between them and their former country. So if a large consultative process like this results in an opinion, whatever that opinion is, yes, it should be communicated very directly.
Your second question is a good one. While transferring money for products is a very important thing, it's a process that takes time and a process that, to put it bluntly, can be hijacked. And it can have a lot of intermediate steps in which the effectiveness of the resources, whether material or economic, is diluted. What Canadians have in communications, engineering, and in all sorts of different areas is extraordinary expertise.
I'll speak to my own area. Canadians are amongst the most effective communicators in the world. If you look at our country, it has very far-flung communities, small communities scattered over gigantic spaces. Yet we've managed to create system after system that enable extremely diverse groups to maintain their identities while also maintaining a cohesive national identity through the use of technology and effective socio-scientific tools. Transferring that kind of expertise from the private sector, government, and academe to a place where there is very limited freedom of the press, where journalists are regularly challenged and repressed, and setting an example from Canada through the transfer of that expertise can achieve extraordinary things.