Mr. Chairman, I suppose my concern is along the same vein. We do have a considerable number of other motions, and I would think and hope there would be very well established reasons why there is absolute urgency to be jumping the queue on motions, but it seems to happen from time to time. I don't see how this has been established in this particular case. It certainly hasn't been verbalized as to the absolute urgency and importance of jumping the queue in this particular instance.
Secondary to that, I still have a great concern for the possible sensitivity of this and what the implication of it might be in jumping the queue when, after all, all we're talking about is an offer here to take it to the steering committee and to have those sensitive discussions made behind closed doors and in camera. Once again, I have no concept as to what that can actually impact, either the person named in the motion or possibly impacting others, but certainly I think that if there's a concern about the sensitivity of it and a consideration to having it done behind closed doors, it should be taken there first. To deal with it here as a motion ahead of that is kind of putting the cart before the horse, if you like, and I have concerns--