I would like you to wait and hear me speak first.
Earlier, Mr. Walsh talked about the substantive nature, or lack thereof, of the reason why Mr. Abdelrazik is on the list. He said, I heard it loud and clear, and it will be in his testimony—that it is not necessarily for a substantive reason: a party, or a country can state that it does not want him to be removed.
That means that, even though we know that it is quite likely that there will be no American base to keep him there, the government does not want him to return to testify. It appears to me that something is not right.
I was reflecting upon this earlier. I talked about Maher Arar, but I also saw William Sampson. Mr. Sampson is furious against Canada: he was in prison in Saudi Arabia, and he ultimately had to turn to Great Britain to get him out of there. He was freed and was not charged.
I think all of this must be considered as a whole and we must give him the benefit of the doubt. If only there were a clue, some kind of evidence, but there is not any! Apparently, it is impossible to get one's name removed from the list, unless one is dead, and even that is not certain. So I think we can still try and convince Mr. Cannon.