Of course there is also the accountability on the Ukrainian side, given the government's commitment to these kinds of partnerships. Typically, in most jurisdictions you would have a government department or minister responsible for coordinating these kinds of input. In the Ukrainian context, we have a quarterly report that we jointly produce with the beneficiary for the responsible ministry.
The other aspect of the monitoring and reporting worth highlighting is the third-party evaluations that tend to happen under these kinds of projects. These are either at the mid-term point of project implementation, or at the close of a project the funder, typically CIDA, would engage a third-party evaluator to assess the achieved versus expected results. And typically in the CIDA context you would also see evaluations being done of the entire country programming framework to see how results are being rolled out.
One of the points worth highlighting here is that in an ideal scenario, what you'd really love to see is a repository where you could bring together all of the lessons learned and all of the recommendations, either in a particular country of focus or in a sector, and roll them up so they can be shared, because these lessons tend to be quite siloed within an organization and the funder. I think we would all benefit from this broader dialogue.