I'm sorry. To add to the answer that's just been given in terms of how onerous this will be on the institutions that are identified, there are currently obligations on our financial institutions. The list is pretty much the same as what you see in this bill.
Under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, in relation to politically exposed persons, we didn't make up the name for the purpose of this legislation. It's an internationally recognized class of suspicious or risky individuals per se. So there's already an obligation on banks and institutions in terms of due diligence.
There is a requirement under section 7 of that act as well for reporting suspicious transactions in relation to the assets of those individuals. So there's already an obligation. This may heighten their awareness once certain people are identified in particular, but they should be doing due diligence in relation to the general clause in any event.