Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to come back to my first question. Unless I am mistaken, Ms. Dubé, you have an issue with the constituents of a foreign representative being able to reside in Canada. According to you, it is a matter of national identity, social cohesion and integration. Unless I am mistaken, that is your argument.
That said, I have always had a hard time understanding Canada's position when a country like the United States, for instance, has no problem in that regard. However, the U.S. is very protective of its sovereignty and has at least as many immigrants as Canada. A country like France, which takes its sovereignty very seriously, sees no issue with this. Germany has no problem with it. I am trying to understand what makes Canada so special. Why is Canada alone in maintaining this position?
I also want to come back to the question asked by my colleague. In Tunisia's case, we are talking about a constituent assembly and not a parliament or a government.