On joint operations, when you have different points of view, do you employ those caveats? I remember when I was in Afghanistan in 2007. You're at KAF and you see certain troops who are behind the wire and are not going out because of their caveats. These were things that were negotiated with the joint force through ISAF and the agreements between countries as to where people would go, what they would do, and how they would operate.
Would you not note that this is one of the differences between countries and how they train and also how they operate in the field, that it's pretty customary now to have caveats and certainly to be very explicit about what those differences are?