It's a tough question. It's a tough question for any democratic society, including my own.
As I was trying to indicate in my remarks before, I think the answer is greater religious freedom, that is, to encourage other imams to take the floor and to denounce extremism. I think the way to counter this kind of speech is better speech. Now, that's a typically U.S. way of approaching the problem, and as I say, it hasn't always worked.
But I do think that at the end of the day.... For example, next Monday we're having an event at Georgetown on this very issue: the experience of Muslim minorities in the west and elsewhere. There will be many who will argue with each other, and there will be American Muslims arguing with each other about what their own religion requires. I think that's healthy. It's not always pleasant. I happen to be a Catholic, and I believe there are routine defamations of my own religion in the American press. But the answer is not to outlaw it: it is better speech.
I think religious freedom is the answer to these imams, to encourage others to counter them publicly and bring them out, and to provide other alternatives to Canadian Muslims who are listening to these people.