I would bring up a point regarding what Mr. Fragiskatos just said.
I remember that, in my previous life, people appointed as ambassadors, for example, were called to appear before the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development. It strikes me as the most relevant committee for these types of things, since we talk about foreign policy and our representatives abroad.
In general, I support the motion moved by my colleague. If the former minister McCallum is already in China and if he did indeed receive his credentials, I imagine that we should proceed on the basis of the other order, namely, the order appointing him as ambassador, rather than the order appointing him as special advisor. I think that, in both cases, it can work.
Thank you.