I guess what I'm struggling with is that when the news first broke that Canada was going to break the sanctions and return the turbine, that wasn't the explanation that was given—that Mr. Putin's bluff needed to be called. The explanation that was given by your government and our government was that national gas supplies needed to be restored to Germany.
If that's the case, if that argument was made, why weren't your government and our government transparent about the actual reasons, not just the flow of natural gas? You've made it clear in your statement that you didn't believe Mr. Putin then and you don't believe him now, so you never believed that Mr. Putin would increase the flow of natural gas. That leads me to believe that the real reason was that you wanted to call Mr. Putin's bluff, so why not, in early July, publicly say that? Why wait until Gazprom refused to accept delivery of the turbine to say it? It seems very odd to me.