Of course, the main reasoning Azerbaijan is citing when it comes to the violation of the territorial integrity of Armenia is that the border lines are not clear, and there is a clear need for limitations and border security.
At the same time, Azerbaijan is engaging in the different talks. What I can say is that the reasoning for being engaged in the talks and then violating the territorial integrity of Armenia is just, somehow, for face-saving. However, as we see, Azerbaijan is not interested in peace at all, because Armenia, since the very beginning, has been engaged in three tracks of negotiations with Azerbaijan.
Those tracks are.... The first one.... We formed commissions on both sides. The first track is the opening of all transport communications in the region. That's one commission. The second one is the delimitation and border security issues. The third one is the agreement on the normalization of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, or a peace treaty, whatever you want to call it. Armenia was engaged in these three tracks in good faith, but what we see from Azerbaijan is no interest in implementing any kind of agreement reached during those discussions.
The actions of Azerbaijan clearly talk about its true reasoning. It's not interested in peace. It's interested in peace on its own terms. As you understand, peace can't be imposed. Peace should be negotiated. Peace means dignity and well-being for all. Peace doesn't mean just an absence of war. We are really interested in having a long-term and just solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and for Armenian-Azerbaijan relations. That's why we request that the international community be present there. Don't allow us to be alone with the Azerbaijani side, because we really need international engagement to find lasting peace and stability in the south Caucasus.