Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you, Ambassador, for your excellent testimony.
I noted that twice in your testimony, early on, you mentioned the term looking for a “durable peace”. You concluded your remarks with “a lasting and sustainable peace”. You've touched on the four areas already in your testimony today.
May I ask, from your perspective, what peace looks like? You mentioned that Azerbaijan seems only to be imposing its own terms. You talked about a negotiation process.
Specifically, though, around four areas...I believe there are four. If there are more, please let me know.
You said the recognition of the border isn't clear. There isn't an international border that's accepted. What does peace look like around that issue?
Obviously, there's the Lachin corridor.
There's the blockade. I'm assuming that the removal and the free movement.... I'll let you put that into words.
Canada's foreign policy is built upon sovereignty, the recognition of other sovereignties or self-determination and peace, and the cessation of hostilities. What does that look like for Nagorno-Karabakh from an Armenian perspective in the context of sovereignty and recognition, as well as the corridor, or lack thereof, to Nakhchivan?
There are those four areas. We've touched on all four of them today, but from an Armenian perspective and a negotiating perspective, or from a desire for a durable peace, what does that look like?