Oh boy, where to start?
There is the office of foreign assets control within Treasury, which really has the expertise on the business side, the following-the-money side, the following-corporate-structure side, to assist the State Department and others in coming up with those lists and to ensure that when we come up with those lists there is due process backing up our justification for the individuals on those lists so they can be enforced. That's the purpose of those. At least it has been my experience that they have individuals with real background in this sort of stuff—accounting, business acumen and so on.
One of the problems for Global Affairs—and it's one of these problems that just need close attention and human resourcing—is that you're talking about diplomats, largely, who haven't necessarily been trained for it. I'm sure Global Affairs is trying to work on some training. We're also talking about an organization that people move in and out of every couple of years. Ideally, you're going to go away on a posting somewhere. It's going to be harder to maintain and build that sort of expertise than it would be in a permanent organization, such as OFAC. We just don't really have that equivalent in Canada to provide the links between those at the RCMP—who will want to know about the corporate structure, the money and how it's happening for their enforcement—and those at Global Affairs, who will know about the names on the list, the foreign countries and that sort of stuff.
I think that's the best I can tell you in that regard.