Thank you for your input.
Overall, I think I heard today that you do agree that it is the government's role and it is appropriate to try to reduce costs by 10% and to try to improve the procurement time by 50%. I don't need an answer; giving nods will do. Everybody sort of agrees on that approach. So from an approach point of view, we're doing the right thing in terms of trying to improve the process for procurement. Would that be correct?
I also have a wife who used to work in the temporary services business, so I have a question for you guys afterwards, just for clarification. But what is your definition of the difference between quality and price? I used to be a municipal councillor, and we always had this discussion that governments often buy on price, and that isn't necessarily the best quality, but how do you get around those two issues? I'm willing to take anybody's response on that.