I guess the one distinction here would be that the amortization amounts do not kick in until the full cash disbursement takes place. So in this example, if it was just $25 million and then amortization, then we'd vote once, and then.... It's the fact that we won't actually have the series of 10 amounts--10 years of $10 million--without actually having the two votes, the $25 million and then the $75 million.
Whether that's good financial management or good planning of the government's resources overall is a different question. They're logically separable. We're only trying to flag that it's a significant departure. It would improve the ability of departments to have the certainty that they can manage a project well, no question.